0 Comments
| | EVGA GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs AMD Radeon HD 7990 |
Released November, 2013
EVGA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
- 1 GHz
- 3 GB GDDR5
by techPowerUp!The card comes overclocked to 980 MHz base clock out of the box, which is a 12% increase over the NVIDIA reference design.
VS
Released April, 2013
AMD Radeon HD 7990
- 950 MHz
- 6 GB GDDR5
by techPowerUp! (Apr, 2013)Moving on to Blu-ray, it immediately becomes clear that the HD 7990 is a power-sucking vampire during movie playback.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 780 Ti vs 7990
Gaming | |
Real world tests using the latest 3D games | |
| Radeon HD 7990 N/A | |
| crysis: warhead (2013), Crysis: Warhead (2012), Batman: Arkham City and 6 more | |
Benchmarks | |
Synthetic tests to measure overall performance | |
| Radeon HD 7990 9.1 | |
| 3DMark Vantage Texture Fill, 3DMark 11 Graphics, 3DMark Vantage Graphics and 1 more | |
Compute Performance | |
General computing tests executed on the GPU | |
| Radeon HD 7990 9.5 | |
| Civilization 5 Texture Decomposition (2013) | |
Noise and Power | |
How loud and hot does the card run idle and under load | |
| Radeon HD 7990 7.6 | |
| TDP, Idle Noise Level, Load Noise Level, Idle Power Consumption and 1 more | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much more energy-efficient load power consumption | 372W | vs | 573W | More than 35% more energy-efficient load power consumption | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much more energy-efficient idle power consumption | 80W | vs | 135W | More than 40% more energy-efficient idle power consumption | |||
| Higher clock speed | 1,006 MHz | vs | 950 MHz | More than 5% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 7,000 MHz | vs | 6,000 MHz | More than 15% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Significantly quieter load noise level | 51.7 dB | vs | 60 dB | Around 15% quieter load noise level | |||
| Much quieter idle noise level | 38.6 dB | vs | 43 dB | More than 10% quieter idle noise level | |||
| Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 46,186 | vs | 41,830 | More than 10% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 1,072 MHz | vs | 1,000 MHz | More than 5% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,750 MHz | vs | 1,500 MHz | More than 15% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2013) score | 396 | vs | 377 | More than 5% better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2013) score | |||
| Significantly lower TDP | 250W | vs | 375W | Around 35% lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
| Is dual GPU | Yes | vs | No | About half of graphics cards are dual GPU | |||
| Significantly more memory | 6,144 MB | vs | 3,072 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Much higher memory bandwidth | 576 GB/s | vs | 336 GB/s | More than 70% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Significantly better 3DMark06 score | 29,050 | vs | 15,619 | More than 85% better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Better 3DMark vantage texture fill score | 206.7 | vs | 173.1 | Around 20% better 3DMark vantage texture fill score | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 7,782 GFLOPS | vs | 5,795 GFLOPS | Around 35% better floating-point performance | |||
| Better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 18,190 | vs | 15,630 | More than 15% better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
| Much wider memory bus | 768 bit | vs | 384 bit | 2x wider memory bus | |||
| More shading units | 4,096 | vs | 2,880 | 1216 more shading units | |||
| Higher texture rate | 243.2 GTexel/s | vs | 210 GTexel/s | More than 15% higher texture rate | |||
| More render output processors | 64 | vs | 48 | 16 more render output processors | |||
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs Radeon HD 7990
3DMark Vantage (Texture Fill) Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX performance
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
173.1
Radeon HD 7990
206.7
3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
15,630
Radeon HD 7990
18,190
3DMark Vantage Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 10 GPU performance
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
46,186
Radeon HD 7990
41,830
3DMark06 Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 9 GPU performance
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
15,619
Radeon HD 7990
29,050
Civilization 5 Texture Decomp (2013) Using the newest graphics cards Civ V can speed screen transitions by reducing texture sizes
Radeon HD 7990
377
Reviews Word on the street
| GeForce GTX 780 Ti | vs | Radeon HD 7990 | ||
| 9.4 | 8.3 | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
| VS | |
| TITAN vs 7990 | ||
| VS | |
| 780 vs 7990 | ||
| VS | |
| 690 vs 7990 | ||
| VS | |
| 780 Ti vs 970 | ||
| VS | |
| 780 Ti vs 980 | ||
| VS | |
| 7990 vs 970 | ||
| VS | |
| 7990 vs 980 | ||
Popular Comparisons
| VS | |
| 970 vs 780 | ||
| VS | |
| 980 vs 780 Ti | ||
| VS | |
| 970 vs 780 Ti | ||
| VS | |
| 970 vs 770 | ||
| VS | |
| R9 270X vs 760 | ||
| VS | |
| 970 vs R9 290X | ||
| VS | |
| R9 280X vs 770 | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 10 comments.
Jancox13 (06:13 AM, August 7, 2014)
Mr. Keyes (11:41 PM, March 25, 2014)
Minamoto Yoshitsune (04:42 AM, March 19, 2014)
Minamoto Yoshitsune (01:25 AM, March 13, 2014)
Mr. Keyes (04:20 AM, March 5, 2014)
LeuK0ld (04:15 AM, March 5, 2014)
Mr. Keyes (04:24 AM, February 19, 2014)
LOL (07:04 PM, December 19, 2013)
jefferysikes (04:36 PM, November 13, 2013)
Madigboo (07:37 PM, November 9, 2013)





