0 Comments
| GeForce 210 PCI vs 210 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 210 PCI vs the 210 OEM. | |||||||
| |||||||
Slightly more memory | 1,024 MB | vs | 512 MB | 2x more memory |
---|
Features Key features of the GeForce 210 PCI vs 210
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
GeForce 210 PCI
6.4 GB/s
GeForce 210
6.4 GB/s
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
GeForce 210 PCI
1.9 GPixel/s
GeForce 210
1.9 GPixel/s
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
GeForce 210 PCI
3.8 GTexel/s
GeForce 210
3.8 GTexel/s
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
GeForce 210 PCI
35.2 GFLOPS
GeForce 210
35.2 GFLOPS
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
GeForce 210
16
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu | GeForce 210 PCI | vs | 210 |
---|---|---|---|
GPU brand | Nvidia | Nvidia | |
GPU name | GT216 | GT216 | |
Market | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clock speed | 475 MHz | 475 MHz | |
Is dual GPU | No | No | |
Reference card | None | Nvidia GeForce 210 520 MHz 512 MB | |
raw performance | |||
Shading units | 16 | 16 | |
Texture mapping units | 8 | 8 | |
Render output processors | 4 | 4 | |
Pixel rate | 1.9 GPixel/s | 1.9 GPixel/s | |
Texture rate | 3.8 GTexel/s | 3.8 GTexel/s | |
Floating-point performance | 35.2 GFLOPS | 35.2 GFLOPS |
memory | GeForce 210 PCI | vs | 210 |
---|---|---|---|
Memory clock speed | 400 MHz | 400 MHz | |
Effective memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 800 MHz | |
Memory bus | 64 bit | 64 bit | |
Memory | 512 MB | 1,024 MB | |
Memory type | DDR2 | DDR2 | |
Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s | 6.4 GB/s | |
noise and power | |||
TDP | 31W | 31W |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$54 | ||
Radeon HD 5450 vs GeForce 210 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$54 | ||
GeForce GT 710 vs 210 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$54 | ||
GeForce 8400 GS vs 210 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$54 | ||
GeForce GT 9500 vs 210 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$55 | $54 | |
GeForce GT 610 vs 210 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$98 | $54 | |
GeForce GT 730 vs 210 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$54 | ||
GeForce GT 8800 vs 210 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
Radeon RX 580 vs GeForce GTX 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
GeForce GTX 1060 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
GeForce GTX 960 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
GeForce GTX 960 vs 750 Ti | ||