0 Comments
| GeForce 510 vs 210 PCI |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Higher effective memory clock speed | 1,796 MHz | vs | 800 MHz | Around 2.2x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly higher memory clock speed | 898 MHz | vs | 400 MHz | Around 2.2x higher memory clock speed | |||
| |||||||
GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 210 PCI vs the 510 OEM. | |||||||
Features Key features of the GeForce 510 vs 210 PCI
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
GeForce 510
14.37 GB/s
GeForce 210 PCI
6.4 GB/s
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
GeForce 510
1.05 GPixel/s
GeForce 210 PCI
1.9 GPixel/s
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
GeForce 510
4.18 GTexel/s
GeForce 210 PCI
3.8 GTexel/s
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
GeForce 510
100.42 GFLOPS
GeForce 210 PCI
35.2 GFLOPS
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
GeForce 510
48
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu | GeForce 510 | vs | 210 PCI |
---|---|---|---|
GPU brand | Nvidia | Nvidia | |
GPU name | GF119 | GT216 | |
Market | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clock speed | 523 MHz | 475 MHz | |
Is dual GPU | No | No | |
Reference card | None | None | |
raw performance | |||
Shading units | 48 | 16 | |
Texture mapping units | 8 | 8 | |
Render output processors | 4 | 4 | |
Pixel rate | 1.05 GPixel/s | 1.9 GPixel/s | |
Texture rate | 4.18 GTexel/s | 3.8 GTexel/s | |
Floating-point performance | 100.42 GFLOPS | 35.2 GFLOPS |
memory | GeForce 510 | vs | 210 PCI |
---|---|---|---|
Memory clock speed | 898 MHz | 400 MHz | |
Effective memory clock speed | 1,796 MHz | 800 MHz | |
Memory bus | 64 bit | 64 bit | |
Memory | 1,024 MB | 512 MB | |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR2 | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.37 GB/s | 6.4 GB/s | |
noise and power | |||
TDP | 25W | 31W |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
510 vs 1050 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$55 | ||
510 vs 610 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
510 vs 550 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
510 vs 710 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
210 PCI vs 9600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
210 PCI vs 4850 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
210 PCI vs 1030 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$267 | ||
1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$267 | ||
970 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$267 | ||
1060 vs RX 580 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
750 Ti vs 960 | ||