Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce 8200M G mGPU

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 8200M G mGPU

Report a correction
Slightly lower TDP 12W vs 31W 2.6x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce 210

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 210

Report a correction
Slightly higher clock speed 475 MHz vs 400 MHz Around 20% higher clock speed

Features Key features of the GeForce 8200M G mGPU  vs 210 

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

GeForce 8200M G mGPU
1.6 GPixel/s
GeForce 210
1.9 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

GeForce 8200M G mGPU
1.6 GTexel/s
GeForce 210
3.8 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

GeForce 8200M G mGPU
GeForce 210

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers

Specifications Full list of technical specs


GeForce 8200M G mGPU  vs
GPU brand Nvidia Nvidia
GPU name MCP77MV GT216
Clock speed 400 MHz 475 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card None Nvidia GeForce 210 520 MHz 512 MB

noise and power

TDP 12W 31W

raw performance

GeForce 8200M G mGPU  vs
Shading units 8 16
Texture mapping units 4 8
Render output processors 4 4
Pixel rate 1.6 GPixel/s 1.9 GPixel/s
Texture rate 1.6 GTexel/s 3.8 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 12.8 GFLOPS 35.2 GFLOPS


comments powered by Disqus