GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 820M vs 410M among Laptop GPUs under 35W TDP

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan and Cloud Gate Factor

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

5.9

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce 820M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce 820M  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Nvidia GeForce 820M

GPUBoss Winner
Front view of GeForce 820M

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce 820M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 820M

Report a correction
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 7,518 vs 4,035 More than 85% better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Much better manhattan score 3,533.46 vs 1,547.6 More than 2.2x better manhattan score
Better PassMark score 600 vs 346 Around 75% better PassMark score
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 4,254 vs 1,475 Around 3x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Better 3DMark06 score 1,266.5 vs 415 More than 3x better 3DMark06 score
Better particle simulation score 74.26 mInteraction/s vs 23.38 mInteraction/s Around 3.2x better particle simulation score
Better PassMark direct compute score 550 vs 153 More than 3.5x better PassMark direct compute score
Higher memory clock speed 900 MHz vs 800 MHz Around 15% higher memory clock speed
Front view of GeForce 410M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 410M

Report a correction

GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 410M vs the 820M.

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce 820M vs 410M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce 820M
23.26 mHash/s
GeForce 410M
7.05 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce 820M
7.69 mPixels/s
GeForce 410M
2.95 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce 820M
160.28 frames/s
GeForce 410M
86.52 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce 820M
74.26 mInteraction/s
GeForce 410M
23.38 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce 820M
3,352.98
GeForce 410M
1,876.85

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce 820M
3,533.46
GeForce 410M
1,547.6

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Comments

comments powered by Disqus