Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce 9100M G mGPU

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 9100M G mGPU

Report a correction
Slightly lower TDP 12W vs 31W 2.6x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce 210

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 210

Report a correction

GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 210 OEM vs the 9100M G mGPU AMD.

Features Key features of the GeForce 9100M G mGPU  vs 210 

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

GeForce 9100M G mGPU
1.8 GPixel/s
GeForce 210
1.9 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

GeForce 9100M G mGPU
3.6 GTexel/s
GeForce 210
3.8 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

GeForce 9100M G mGPU
17.6 GFLOPS
GeForce 210
35.2 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers

Specifications Full list of technical specs

gpu

GeForce 9100M G mGPU  vs
210 
GPU brand Nvidia Nvidia
GPU name MCP77MH GT216
Clock speed 450 MHz 475 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card None Nvidia GeForce 210 520 MHz 512 MB

noise and power

TDP 12W 31W

raw performance

GeForce 9100M G mGPU  vs
210 
Shading units 8 16
Texture mapping units 8 8
Render output processors 4 4
Pixel rate 1.8 GPixel/s 1.9 GPixel/s
Texture rate 3.6 GTexel/s 3.8 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 17.6 GFLOPS 35.2 GFLOPS

Comments

comments powered by Disqus