Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce 920M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 920M

Report a correction
Much better T-Rex score 3,358.92 vs 1,190.83 More than 2.8x better T-Rex score
Significantly higher clock speed 954 MHz vs 606 MHz More than 55% higher clock speed
Better PassMark score 711 vs 215 More than 3.2x better PassMark score
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Better floating-point performance 732.7 GFLOPS vs 48.96 GFLOPS Around 15x better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 30.53 GTexel/s vs 4.85 GTexel/s More than 6.2x higher texture rate
More render output processors 16 vs 4 12 more render output processors
More texture mapping units 32 vs 8 24 more texture mapping units
More shading units 384 vs 16 368 more shading units
Higher memory clock speed 900 MHz vs 667 MHz Around 35% higher memory clock speed
Front view of GeForce 310M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 310M

Report a correction
Lower TDP 14W vs 33W 2.4x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce 920M vs 310M

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce 920M
3,358.92
GeForce 310M
1,190.83

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus