Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce 920MX

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 920MX

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 1,072 MHz vs 738 MHz More than 45% higher clock speed
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Higher texture rate 25.73 GTexel/s vs 5.9 GTexel/s More than 4.2x higher texture rate
Slightly better floating-point performance 548.9 GFLOPS vs 141.7 GFLOPS More than 3.8x better floating-point performance
Higher pixel rate 8.58 GPixel/s vs 1.48 GPixel/s More than 5.8x higher pixel rate
More texture mapping units 24 vs 8 Three times as many texture mapping units
More shading units 256 vs 48 208 more shading units
Front view of GeForce 810M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 810M

Report a correction

GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 810M vs the 920MX.

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce 920MX vs 810M

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

Features Key features of the GeForce 920MX  vs 810M 

memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory

GeForce 920MX
14.4 GB/s
GeForce 810M
14.4 GB/s

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

GeForce 920MX
8.58 GPixel/s
GeForce 810M
1.48 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

GeForce 920MX
25.73 GTexel/s
GeForce 810M
5.9 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

GeForce 920MX
548.9 GFLOPS
GeForce 810M
141.7 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

Comments

comments powered by Disqus