GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 920MX vs 910M among Laptop GPUs under 35W TDP

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan and Cloud Gate Factor

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

8

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce 920MX 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce 920MX  based on its benchmarks.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce 920MX

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 920MX

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 1,072 MHz vs 775 MHz Around 40% higher clock speed
Better PassMark score 986 vs 475 More than 2x better PassMark score
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Significantly better manhattan score 3,363.45 vs 1,730.77 Around 95% better manhattan score
Higher battlefield 4 framerate 11 vs 7.3 More than 50% higher battlefield 4 framerate
Slightly lower TDP 16W vs 33W 2.1x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce 910M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 910M

Report a correction

GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 910M Retail vs the 920MX.

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce 920MX vs 910M

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce 920MX
3,345.76
GeForce 910M
3,363.04

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce 920MX
3,363.45
GeForce 910M
1,730.77

Battlefield 4

Bioshock Infinite

Comments

comments powered by Disqus