GeForce 930M vs 310M |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better T-Rex score | 3,352.64 | vs | 1,190.83 | More than 2.8x better T-Rex score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly higher clock speed | 928 MHz | vs | 606 MHz | Around 55% higher clock speed | |||
| Better PassMark score | 904 | vs | 215 | Around 4.2x better PassMark score | |||
| More memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 712.7 GFLOPS | vs | 48.96 GFLOPS | More than 14.5x better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher texture rate | 22.27 GTexel/s | vs | 4.85 GTexel/s | More than 4.5x higher texture rate | |||
| More shading units | 384 | vs | 16 | 368 more shading units | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 900 MHz | vs | 667 MHz | Around 35% higher memory clock speed | |||
| More texture mapping units | 24 | vs | 8 | Three times as many texture mapping units | |||
| |||||||
| Lower TDP | 14W | vs | 33W | 2.4x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce 930M vs 310M
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 930M vs 920M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 930M vs R5 M330 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 930M vs 940M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 930M vs 840M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 930M vs 930MX | ||
| | VS |  |
| $200 | ||
| 930M vs 660 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 930M vs 950M | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS |  |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 960 vs R9 380 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs R9 390 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 290X vs 970 | ||
 | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| 750 Ti vs 960 | ||
