GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 930M vs 920MX among Laptop GPUs under 35W TDP

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan and Cloud Gate Factor

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

8.7

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce 920MX 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce 920MX  based on its compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of GeForce 920MX

Nvidia GeForce 920MX

GPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce 930M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 930M

Report a correction
Higher battlefield 4 framerate 43 vs 11 Around 4x higher battlefield 4 framerate
Front view of GeForce 920MX

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 920MX

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1,072 MHz vs 928 MHz More than 15% higher clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 1,176 MHz vs 941 MHz Around 25% higher turbo clock speed
Slightly lower TDP 16W vs 33W 2.1x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce 930M vs 920MX

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce 930M
3,378.64
GeForce 920MX
3,360.1

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce 930M
3,737.58
GeForce 920MX
3,692.99

Battlefield 4

PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus