GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 930MX vs 930M among Laptop GPUs under 35W TDP

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan and Cloud Gate Factor

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

8.8

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce 930MX 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce 930MX  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Nvidia GeForce 930MX

GPUBoss Winner
Front view of GeForce 930MX

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce 930MX

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 930MX

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1,019 MHz vs 928 MHz Around 10% higher clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 1,176 MHz vs 941 MHz Around 25% higher turbo clock speed
Higher pixel rate 16.3 GPixel/s vs 7.42 GPixel/s Around 2.2x higher pixel rate
More render output processors 16 vs 8 Twice as many render output processors
Higher memory clock speed 1,000 MHz vs 900 MHz More than 10% higher memory clock speed
Slightly lower TDP 17W vs 33W Around 50% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce 930M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 930M

Report a correction
Higher battlefield 4 framerate 43 vs 11.9 More than 3.5x higher battlefield 4 framerate

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce 930MX vs 930M

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce 930MX
3,362.7
GeForce 930M
3,378.64

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce 930MX
3,713.16
GeForce 930M
3,737.58

Battlefield 4

PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

Read more

Comments

Showing 3 comments.
Oh ok, thanks I have the 930M
No, the MX has a much more recent architecture. It has a better clock and better peformance, still, thanks to its more recent architecture, the MX consume less than the M
Is the 930MX a overclocked version of the 930M ? Thanks.
comments powered by Disqus