Winner
Nvidia GeForce 930MX
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce 930MX based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce 930MX vs 930M |
Released March, 2016
Nvidia GeForce 930MX
- 1 GHz
- 2 GB DDR3
7.6 Out of 10
by hassan-mujtaba (May, 2014)Performance figures a re not known but it is mentioned that the MX100 SSDs will feature very competitive price points which is a good sign in the SSD market since costs are going down and SSDs become the choice for storage globally due to the attractive prices.
VS
Released March, 2015
Nvidia GeForce 930M
- 928 MHz
- 2 GB DDR3
8.6 Out of 10
by hassan-mujtaba (Sep, 2014)Intel is so much focused on the power output of the Core M die that they even designed a new PCH known as Broadwell PCH-LP which is focused on power.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 930MX vs 930M among Laptop GPUs under 35W TDP
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan and Cloud Gate Factor | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 8.6 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Nvidia GeForce 930MXGPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 1,019 MHz | vs | 928 MHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slightly better PassMark score | 1,126 | vs | 904 | Around 25% better PassMark score | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 1,176 MHz | vs | 941 MHz | Around 25% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 16.3 GPixel/s | vs | 7.42 GPixel/s | Around 2.2x higher pixel rate | |||
| Better T-Rex score | 3,362.7 | vs | 3,059.67 | Around 10% better T-Rex score | |||
| More render output processors | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,000 MHz | vs | 900 MHz | More than 10% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 877 | vs | 618 | More than 40% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Slightly lower TDP | 17W | vs | 33W | Around 50% lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
| Much higher battlefield 4 framerate | 43 | vs | 11.9 | More than 3.5x higher battlefield 4 framerate | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce 930MX vs 930M
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Battlefield 4
PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute
Laptops
Looking for a laptop?
- 3 laptops with the GeForce 930MX, starting from $879
- 2 laptops with the GeForce 930M, starting from $899
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 930MX vs MX150 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 930MX vs 940MX | ||
| | VS |  |
| 930MX vs 1050 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $200 | ||
| 930MX vs 660 | ||
 | VS |  |
| 930M vs 920M | ||
| | VS | |
| $200 | ||
| 930M vs 660 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 930M vs 940M | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 1080 Ti vs RTX 2080 Rev. A | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 vs MX150 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $291 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| $291 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 580 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1080 Ti vs RTX 2080 | ||
 | VS | |
| $291 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 3 comments.
