GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 930MX vs 930M among Laptop GPUs under 35W TDP

Gaming

GeForce 930MX
5.5
GeForce 930M
10.0
GeForce 920M
5.3
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

GeForce 930MX
10.0
GeForce 930M
5.0
GeForce 920M
5.9
T-Rex, Manhattan and Cloud Gate Factor

Computing

GeForce 930MX
6.7
GeForce 930M
n.d.
GeForce 920M
6.1
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

GeForce 930MX
10.0
GeForce 930M
6.3
GeForce 920M
5.2
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more

Value

GeForce 930MX
6.6
GeForce 930M
7.5
GeForce 920M
5.0
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more

Noise and Power

GeForce 930MX
9.7
GeForce 930M
5.0
GeForce 920M
5.0
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more
8.1

Overall Score

GeForce 930MX
8.1
GeForce 930M
7.4
GeForce 920M
5.3

Winner
Nvidia GeForce 930MX 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce 930MX  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Nvidia GeForce 930MX

GPUBoss Winner
 Front view of GeForce 930MX
Front view of GeForce 930M

Nvidia GeForce 930M

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce 930MX

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 930MX

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1,019 MHz vs 928 MHz Around 10% higher clock speed
Much better T-Rex score 3,361.4 vs 3,352.64 Almost the same
Slightly better PassMark score 1,126 vs 904 Around 25% better PassMark score
Higher turbo clock speed 1,176 MHz vs 941 MHz Around 25% higher turbo clock speed
Higher pixel rate 16.3 GPixel/s vs 7.42 GPixel/s Around 2.2x higher pixel rate
More render output processors 16 vs 8 Twice as many render output processors
Higher memory clock speed 1,000 MHz vs 900 MHz More than 10% higher memory clock speed
Better PassMark direct compute score 877 vs 618 More than 40% better PassMark direct compute score
Slightly lower TDP 17W vs 33W Around 50% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce 930M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 930M

Report a correction
Much higher battlefield 4 framerate 43 vs 11.9 More than 3.5x higher battlefield 4 framerate

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce 930MX vs 930M

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

GeForce 930MX
1,126
GeForce 930M
904

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce 930MX
3,361.4
GeForce 930M
3,352.64

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce 930MX
3,718.94
GeForce 930M
3,711.04

Battlefield 4

GeForce 930MX
11.9
GeForce 930M
43

PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

GeForce 930MX
877
GeForce 930M
618

Read more

Comments

Showing 3 comments.
King Delirious (02:21 AM, July 26, 2016)
Oh ok, thanks I have the 930M
Alex95sang (04:52 PM, July 25, 2016)
No, the MX has a much more recent architecture. It has a better clock and better peformance, still, thanks to its more recent architecture, the MX consume less than the M
King Delirious (06:45 PM, July 24, 2016)
Is the 930MX a overclocked version of the 930M ? Thanks.
comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

GPUBoss