Winner
Nvidia GeForce 940MX
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce 940MX based on its benchmarks.
See full details GeForce 940MX vs 910M |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 940MX vs 910M among Laptop GPUs under 35W TDP
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan and Cloud Gate Factor | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 8 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 1,122 MHz | vs | 775 MHz | Around 45% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better PassMark score | 1,225 | vs | 475 | More than 2.5x better PassMark score | |||
| Much better manhattan score | 3,663.44 | vs | 1,730.77 | More than 2x better manhattan score | |||
| More memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Significantly better face detection score | 30.45 mPixels/s | vs | 6.45 mPixels/s | Around 4.8x better face detection score | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 861.7 GFLOPS | vs | 297.6 GFLOPS | Around 3x better floating-point performance | |||
| Slightly higher texture rate | 26.93 GTexel/s | vs | 12.4 GTexel/s | Around 2.2x higher texture rate | |||
| More shading units | 384 | vs | 96 | 288 more shading units | |||
| Higher battlefield 4 framerate | 11.9 | vs | 7.3 | Around 65% higher battlefield 4 framerate | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,001 MHz | vs | 900 MHz | More than 10% higher memory clock speed | |||
| |||||||
| GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 910M Retail vs the 940MX. | |||||||
Report a correction
