GeForce 9600 GSO 512 vs 210 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Slightly higher clock speed | 550 MHz | vs | 475 MHz | More than 15% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly better cloud gate factor score | 7.76 | vs | 3.15 | Around 2.5x better cloud gate factor score | |||
| Significantly wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 64 bit | 4x wider memory bus | |||
| More render output processors | 16 | vs | 4 | 12 more render output processors | |||
| Slightly higher pixel rate | 8.8 GPixel/s | vs | 1.9 GPixel/s | Around 4.8x higher pixel rate | |||
| More texture mapping units | 24 | vs | 8 | Three times as many texture mapping units | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 505 MHz | vs | 400 MHz | More than 25% higher memory clock speed | |||
| |||||||
| Lower TDP | 31W | vs | 90W | 2.9x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce 9600 GSO 512 vs 210
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $54 | ||
| 5450 vs 210 | ||
 | VS | |
| $54 | ||
| 710 vs 210 | ||
 | VS | |
| $54 | ||
| 8400 GS vs 210 | ||
 | VS | |
| $55 | $54 | |
| 610 vs 210 | ||
 | VS | |
| $54 | ||
| 9500 vs 210 | ||
 | VS | |
| $98 | $54 | |
| 730 vs 210 | ||
 | VS | |
| $54 | ||
| 8800 vs 210 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $304 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
 | VS |  |
| 960 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 380 vs 960 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 390 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs R9 290X | ||
