0 Comments
| GeForce 9600 GSO 512 vs 210 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Slightly higher clock speed | 550 MHz | vs | 475 MHz | More than 15% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly better cloud gate factor score | 7.76 | vs | 3.15 | Around 2.5x better cloud gate factor score | |||
Significantly wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 64 bit | 4x wider memory bus | |||
More render output processors | 16 | vs | 4 | 12 more render output processors | |||
Slightly higher pixel rate | 8.8 GPixel/s | vs | 1.9 GPixel/s | Around 4.8x higher pixel rate | |||
More texture mapping units | 24 | vs | 8 | Three times as many texture mapping units | |||
Higher memory clock speed | 505 MHz | vs | 400 MHz | More than 25% higher memory clock speed | |||
| |||||||
Lower TDP | 31W | vs | 90W | 2.9x lower TDP |
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce 9600 GSO 512 vs 210
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
GeForce 210
177
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
GeForce 9600 GSO 512
2,972.41
GeForce 210
1,446.7
Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
GeForce 9600 GSO 512
7.76
GeForce 210
3.15
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$54 | ||
5450 vs 210 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$54 | ||
710 vs 210 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$54 | ||
8400 GS vs 210 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$55 | $54 | |
610 vs 210 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$54 | ||
9500 vs 210 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$98 | $54 | |
730 vs 210 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$54 | ||
8800 vs 210 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1060 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R9 380 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R9 390 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs R9 290X | ||