GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 9600M GT vs 320M among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce 9600M GT

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 9600M GT

Report a correction
Slightly higher clock speed 500 MHz vs 450 MHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Front view of GeForce 320M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 320M

Report a correction

GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 320M vs the 9600M GT.

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce 9600M GT vs 320M

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce 9600M GT
2,024.88
GeForce 320M
1,735.57

Features Key features of the GeForce 9600M GT  vs 320M 

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

GeForce 9600M GT
4 GPixel/s
GeForce 320M
3.6 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

GeForce 9600M GT
8 GTexel/s
GeForce 320M
7.2 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

GeForce 9600M GT
80 GFLOPS
GeForce 320M
91.2 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers

Comments

comments powered by Disqus