GeForce FX 5200 Low Profile vs 210 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the FX 5200 Low Profile vs the 210 OEM. | |||||||
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 475 MHz | vs | 250 MHz | 90% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More memory | 1,024 MB | vs | 64 MB | 16x more memory | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 800 MHz | vs | 400 MHz | 2x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 400 MHz | vs | 200 MHz | 2x higher memory clock speed | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the GeForce FX 5200 Low Profile vs 210
effective memory clock speed Frequency at which memory can be read from and written to
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu | GeForce FX 5200 Low Profile | vs | 210 |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPU brand | Nvidia | Nvidia | |
| GPU name | NV34 | GT216 | |
| Market | Desktop | Desktop | |
| Clock speed | 250 MHz | 475 MHz | |
| Is dual GPU | No | No | |
| Reference card | None | Nvidia GeForce 210 520 MHz 512 MB | |
raw performance | |||
| Texture mapping units | 4 | 8 | |
| Render output processors | 4 | 4 | |
| Pixel rate | 1 GPixel/s | 1.9 GPixel/s | |
| Texture rate | 1 GTexel/s | 3.8 GTexel/s | |
memory | GeForce FX 5200 Low Profile | vs | 210 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memory clock speed | 200 MHz | 400 MHz | |
| Effective memory clock speed | 400 MHz | 800 MHz | |
| Memory bus | 64 bit | 64 bit | |
| Memory | 64 MB | 1,024 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 3.2 GB/s | 6.4 GB/s |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $54 | ||
| GeForce 210 vs Radeon HD 5450 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $54 | ||
| GeForce 210 vs GT 710 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $54 | ||
| GeForce 210 vs 8400 GS | ||
| | VS |  |
| $54 | ||
| GeForce 210 vs GT 9500 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $54 | $55 | |
| GeForce 210 vs GT 610 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $54 | $98 | |
| GeForce 210 vs GT 730 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $54 | ||
| GeForce 210 vs GT 8800 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $304 | ||
| GeForce GTX 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| GeForce GTX 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| GeForce GTX 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| GeForce GTX 970 vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| GeForce GTX 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $304 | ||
| GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon RX 580 | ||
