GeForce FX 5200 Low Profile vs 8400 GS |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the FX 5200 Low Profile vs the 8400 GS Rev. 3. | |||||||
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 520 MHz | vs | 250 MHz | More than 2x higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 800 MHz | vs | 400 MHz | 2x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 400 MHz | vs | 200 MHz | 2x higher memory clock speed | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the GeForce FX 5200 Low Profile vs 8400 GS
effective memory clock speed Frequency at which memory can be read from and written to
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu | GeForce FX 5200 Low Profile | vs | 8400 GS |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPU brand | Nvidia | Nvidia | |
| GPU name | NV34 | GT218 B1 | |
| Market | Desktop | Desktop | |
| Clock speed | 250 MHz | 520 MHz | |
| Is dual GPU | No | No | |
| Reference card | None | None | |
raw performance | |||
| Texture mapping units | 4 | 8 | |
| Render output processors | 4 | 4 | |
| Pixel rate | 1 GPixel/s | 2.08 GPixel/s | |
| Texture rate | 1 GTexel/s | 4.16 GTexel/s | |
memory | GeForce FX 5200 Low Profile | vs | 8400 GS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memory clock speed | 200 MHz | 400 MHz | |
| Effective memory clock speed | 400 MHz | 800 MHz | |
| Memory bus | 64 bit | 64 bit | |
| Memory | 64 MB | 512 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 3.2 GB/s | 6.4 GB/s |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $54 | ||
| 8400 GS vs 210 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 8400 GS vs 5450 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $55 | ||
| 8400 GS vs 610 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 8400 GS vs 9500 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 8400 GS vs 6450 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $98 | ||
| 8400 GS vs 730 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $107 | ||
| 8400 GS vs 630 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| 750 Ti vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs R9 390 | ||
