Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce FX 5200 Low Profile

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce FX 5200 Low Profile

Report a correction

GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the FX 5200 Low Profile vs the 9300 SE.

Front view of GeForce 9300 SE

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 9300 SE

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 540 MHz vs 250 MHz Around 2.2x higher clock speed
Higher effective memory clock speed 800 MHz vs 400 MHz 2x higher effective memory clock speed
Higher memory clock speed 400 MHz vs 200 MHz 2x higher memory clock speed

Features Key features of the GeForce FX 5200 Low Profile  vs 9300 SE 

effective memory clock speed Frequency at which memory can be read from and written to

memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

GeForce 9300 SE
2.16 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

GeForce 9300 SE
4.32 GTexel/s

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers

Specifications Full list of technical specs


GeForce FX 5200 Low Profile  vs
9300 SE 
GPU brand Nvidia Nvidia
GPU name NV34 G98
Market Desktop Desktop
Clock speed 250 MHz 540 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card None None

raw performance

Texture mapping units 4 8
Render output processors 4 4
Pixel rate 1 GPixel/s 2.16 GPixel/s
Texture rate 1 GTexel/s 4.32 GTexel/s


GeForce FX 5200 Low Profile  vs
9300 SE 
Memory clock speed 200 MHz 400 MHz
Effective memory clock speed 400 MHz 800 MHz
Memory bus 64 bit 64 bit
Memory 64 MB 256 MB
Memory bandwidth 3.2 GB/s 6.4 GB/s


comments powered by Disqus