Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GT 1030

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 1030

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 1,227 MHz vs 400 MHz More than 3x higher clock speed
Better floating-point performance 1,127 GFLOPS vs 25.6 GFLOPS More than 44x better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 35.23 GTexel/s vs 3.2 GTexel/s More than 11x higher texture rate
Higher pixel rate 11.74 GPixel/s vs 1.6 GPixel/s More than 7.2x higher pixel rate
More shading units 384 vs 16 368 more shading units
Front view of GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel

Reasons to consider the
Intel GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel

Report a correction
Slightly lower TDP 12W vs 30W 2.5x lower TDP

Features Key features of the GeForce GT 1030  vs 8200M G mGPU Intel 

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

GeForce GT 1030
11.74 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

GeForce GT 1030
35.23 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

GeForce GT 1030
1,127 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers

Specifications Full list of technical specs

gpu

GeForce GT 1030  vs
8200M G mGPU Intel 
GPU brand Nvidia Nvidia
GPU name GP108 MCP79
Clock speed 1,227 MHz 400 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card None None

noise and power

TDP 30W 12W

raw performance

GeForce GT 1030  vs
8200M G mGPU Intel 
Shading units 384 16
Texture mapping units 24 8
Render output processors 8 4
Pixel rate 11.74 GPixel/s 1.6 GPixel/s
Texture rate 35.23 GTexel/s 3.2 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 1,127 GFLOPS 25.6 GFLOPS

Comments

comments powered by Disqus