GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 130 vs 920MX among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GT 130

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 130

Report a correction
Slightly more render output processors 12 vs 8 4 more render output processors
Slightly wider memory bus 192 bit vs 64 bit 3x wider memory bus
Front view of GeForce 920MX

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 920MX

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 1,072 MHz vs 500 MHz Around 2.2x higher clock speed
More memory 2,048 MB vs 512 MB 4x more memory
Higher effective memory clock speed 1,800 MHz vs 1,000 MHz 80% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher memory clock speed 900 MHz vs 500 MHz 80% higher memory clock speed
Lower TDP 16W vs 75W 4.7x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GT 130 vs 920MX

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GT 130
2,106.85
GeForce 920MX
3,359.28

Comments

comments powered by Disqus