GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 130M vs 940MX among Laptop GPUs under 35W TDP

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan and Cloud Gate Factor

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

8.3

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce 940MX 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce 940MX  based on its benchmarks.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GT 130M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 130M

Report a correction
Wider memory bus 128 bit vs 64 bit 2x wider memory bus
Front view of GeForce 940MX

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 940MX

Report a correction
Much better T-Rex score 3,362.58 vs 2,744.48 Around 25% better T-Rex score
Much higher clock speed 1,122 MHz vs 600 MHz More than 85% higher clock speed
Better PassMark score 1,225 vs 304 More than 4x better PassMark score
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Better floating-point performance 861.7 GFLOPS vs 96 GFLOPS Around 9x better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 26.93 GTexel/s vs 9.6 GTexel/s More than 2.8x higher texture rate
More shading units 384 vs 32 352 more shading units
Higher memory clock speed 1,001 MHz vs 800 MHz More than 25% higher memory clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GT 130M vs 940MX

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GT 130M
2,744.48
GeForce 940MX
3,362.58

Comments

comments powered by Disqus