GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 230 vs 940MX among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GT 230

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 230

Report a correction
More texture mapping units 48 vs 24 Twice as many texture mapping units
Front view of GeForce 940MX

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 940MX

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 1,122 MHz vs 500 MHz Around 2.2x higher clock speed
Slightly better PassMark score 1,225 vs 473 More than 2.5x better PassMark score
Higher effective memory clock speed 2,002 MHz vs 1,000 MHz More than 2x higher effective memory clock speed
Better cloud gate factor score 12.04 vs 7.8 Around 55% better cloud gate factor score
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,001 MHz vs 500 MHz More than 2x higher memory clock speed
Slightly more shading units 384 vs 96 288 more shading units
Lower TDP 23W vs 75W 3.3x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GT 230 vs 940MX

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GT 230
2,752.35
GeForce 940MX
3,362.58

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Comments

comments powered by Disqus