Winner
Nvidia GeForce 920M
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce 920M based on its benchmarks.
See full details GeForce GT 230M vs 920M |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 230M vs 920M among Laptop GPUs under 35W TDP
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan and Cloud Gate Factor | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 2.6 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Wider memory bus | 128 bit | vs | 64 bit | 2x wider memory bus | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Much better T-Rex score | 3,358.92 | vs | 2,088.76 | More than 60% better T-Rex score | |||
| Much higher clock speed | 954 MHz | vs | 500 MHz | More than 90% higher clock speed | |||
| Better PassMark score | 711 | vs | 337 | More than 2x better PassMark score | |||
| More memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 732.7 GFLOPS | vs | 105.6 GFLOPS | Around 7x better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher texture rate | 30.53 GTexel/s | vs | 8 GTexel/s | More than 3.8x higher texture rate | |||
| More shading units | 384 | vs | 48 | 336 more shading units | |||
| More render output processors | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| More texture mapping units | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many texture mapping units | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 900 MHz | vs | 800 MHz | Around 15% higher memory clock speed | |||
Report a correction
