GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 230M vs 920MX among Laptop GPUs under 35W TDP

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan and Cloud Gate Factor

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

7.7

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce 920MX 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce 920MX  based on its benchmarks.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GT 230M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 230M

Report a correction
Wider memory bus 128 bit vs 64 bit 2x wider memory bus
Front view of GeForce 920MX

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 920MX

Report a correction
Much better T-Rex score 3,359.28 vs 2,088.76 More than 60% better T-Rex score
Much higher clock speed 1,072 MHz vs 500 MHz Around 2.2x higher clock speed
Better PassMark score 986 vs 337 Around 3x better PassMark score
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Higher texture rate 25.73 GTexel/s vs 8 GTexel/s Around 3.2x higher texture rate
Slightly more shading units 256 vs 48 208 more shading units
Higher memory clock speed 900 MHz vs 800 MHz Around 15% higher memory clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GT 230M vs 920MX

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GT 230M
2,088.76
GeForce 920MX
3,359.28

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus