GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 230M vs 230 among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.1

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GT 230 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GT 230  based on its benchmarks.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GT 230M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 230M

Report a correction
Slightly higher effective memory clock speed 1,600 MHz vs 1,000 MHz 60% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher memory clock speed 800 MHz vs 500 MHz 60% higher memory clock speed
Lower TDP 23W vs 75W 3.3x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GT 230

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 230

Report a correction
More texture mapping units 48 vs 16 Three times as many texture mapping units

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GT 230M vs 230

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GT 230M
2,088.76
GeForce GT 230
2,752.35

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus