Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Nvidia GeForce GT 240M

Front view of GeForce GT 240M
Front view of GeForce 9650M GT

Nvidia GeForce 9650M GT

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GT 240M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 240M

Report a correction
Slightly better PassMark score 355 vs 259 More than 35% better PassMark score
Front view of GeForce 9650M GT

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 9650M GT

Report a correction

GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the GeForce 9650M GT vs the GeForce GT 240M.

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GT 240M vs 9650M GT

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

GeForce GT 240M
355
GeForce 9650M GT
259

Features Key features of the GeForce GT 240M  vs 9650M GT 

memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory

GeForce GT 240M
25.6 GB/s
GeForce 9650M GT
25.6 GB/s

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

GeForce GT 240M
4.4 GPixel/s
GeForce 9650M GT
4.4 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

GeForce GT 240M
8.8 GTexel/s
GeForce 9650M GT
8.8 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

GeForce GT 240M
116.2 GFLOPS
GeForce 9650M GT
84.8 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

GeForce GT 240M
48
GeForce 9650M GT
32

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

GeForce GT 240M
16
GeForce 9650M GT
16

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

GPUBoss