0 Comments
| GeForce GT 240M vs 9650M GT |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Slightly better PassMark score | 355 | vs | 259 | More than 35% better PassMark score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the GeForce 9650M GT vs the GeForce GT 240M. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GT 240M vs 9650M GT
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
GeForce GT 240M
355
GeForce 9650M GT
259
Features Key features of the GeForce GT 240M vs 9650M GT
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
GeForce GT 240M
25.6 GB/s
GeForce 9650M GT
25.6 GB/s
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
GeForce GT 240M
4.4 GPixel/s
GeForce 9650M GT
4.4 GPixel/s
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
GeForce GT 240M
8.8 GTexel/s
GeForce 9650M GT
8.8 GTexel/s
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
GeForce GT 240M
116.2 GFLOPS
GeForce 9650M GT
84.8 GFLOPS