Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GT 320M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 320M

Report a correction
Slightly higher clock speed 500 MHz vs 450 MHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Front view of GeForce 320M Mac

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 320M Mac

Report a correction
Slightly more texture mapping units 16 vs 8 Twice as many texture mapping units

Features Key features of the GeForce GT 320M  vs 320M Mac 

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

GeForce GT 320M
4 GPixel/s
GeForce 320M Mac
3.6 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

GeForce GT 320M
4 GTexel/s
GeForce 320M Mac
7.2 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

GeForce GT 320M
52.8 GFLOPS
GeForce 320M Mac
91.2 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers

Specifications Full list of technical specs

gpu

GeForce GT 320M  vs
320M Mac 
GPU brand Nvidia Nvidia
GPU name GT216 MCP89
Clock speed 500 MHz 450 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card Nvidia GeForce GT 320M 500 MHz 512 MB None

noise and power

TDP 23W 23W

raw performance

GeForce GT 320M  vs
320M Mac 
Shading units 24 48
Texture mapping units 8 16
Render output processors 8 8
Pixel rate 4 GPixel/s 3.6 GPixel/s
Texture rate 4 GTexel/s 7.2 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 52.8 GFLOPS 91.2 GFLOPS

Comments

comments powered by Disqus