GeForce GT 320M vs 9400M

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

VS

Nvidia GeForce GT 320M

Front view of GeForce GT 320M

Front view of GeForce 9400M

Nvidia GeForce 9400M

Join the discussion

Front view of GeForce GT 320M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 320M

Report a correction

Slightly more render output processors

8

vs

4

Twice as many render output processors

Front view of GeForce 9400M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 9400M

Report a correction

Higher clock speed

580 MHz

vs

500 MHz

More than 15% higher clock speed

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

GeForce GT 320M

4 GPixel/s

2.32 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

GeForce GT 320M

4 GTexel/s

4.64 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

GeForce GT 320M

52.8 GFLOPS

44.8 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

GeForce GT 320M

24

16

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

GeForce GT 320M

8

8

render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers

GeForce GT 320M

8

4

gpu	GeForce GT 320M	vs	9400M
GPU brand	Nvidia		Nvidia
GPU name	GT216		C79MX
Clock speed	500 MHz		580 MHz
Is dual GPU	No		No
Reference card	Nvidia GeForce GT 320M 500 MHz 512 MB		None
noise and power
TDP	23W		12W

raw performance	GeForce GT 320M	vs	9400M
Shading units	24		16
Texture mapping units	8		8
Render output processors	8		4
Pixel rate	4 GPixel/s		2.32 GPixel/s
Texture rate	4 GTexel/s		4.64 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance	52.8 GFLOPS		44.8 GFLOPS

Follow us

Compare

Popular Comparisons

VS

320M vs R5 M330

VS

9400M vs 320M Mac

Comments

comments powered by Disqus