GeForce GT 320M vs 9600M GT Mac |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Slightly more memory | 1,024 MB | vs | 512 MB | 2x more memory | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Slightly more texture mapping units | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many texture mapping units | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the GeForce GT 320M vs 9600M GT Mac
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu | GeForce GT 320M | vs | 9600M GT Mac |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPU brand | Nvidia | Nvidia | |
| GPU name | GT216 | G96 | |
| Market | Laptop | Laptop | |
| Clock speed | 500 MHz | 500 MHz | |
| Is dual GPU | No | No | |
| Reference card | Nvidia GeForce GT 320M 500 MHz 512 MB | None | |
raw performance | |||
| Shading units | 24 | 32 | |
| Texture mapping units | 8 | 16 | |
| Render output processors | 8 | 8 | |
| Pixel rate | 4 GPixel/s | 4 GPixel/s | |
| Texture rate | 4 GTexel/s | 8 GTexel/s | |
| Floating-point performance | 52.8 GFLOPS | 80 GFLOPS | |
memory | GeForce GT 320M | vs | 9600M GT Mac |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memory clock speed | 790 MHz | 792 MHz | |
| Effective memory clock speed | 1,580 MHz | 1,584 MHz | |
| Memory bus | 128 bit | 128 bit | |
| Memory | 1,024 MB | 512 MB | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.28 GB/s | 25.34 GB/s | |
noise and power | |||
| TDP | 23W | 23W | |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $267 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 580 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $267 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $267 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
 | VS | |
| 1050 vs 1050 Ti | ||
