Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GT 320M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 320M

Report a correction
Slightly more memory 1,024 MB vs 512 MB 2x more memory
Front view of GeForce 9600M GT Mac

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 9600M GT Mac

Report a correction
Slightly more texture mapping units 16 vs 8 Twice as many texture mapping units

Features Key features of the GeForce GT 320M  vs 9600M GT Mac 

memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory

GeForce GT 320M
25.28 GB/s

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

GeForce GT 320M
4 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

GeForce GT 320M
4 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

GeForce GT 320M

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

Specifications Full list of technical specs


GeForce GT 320M  vs
9600M GT Mac 
GPU brand Nvidia Nvidia
GPU name GT216 G96
Market Laptop Laptop
Clock speed 500 MHz 500 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card Nvidia GeForce GT 320M 500 MHz 512 MB None

raw performance

Shading units 24 32
Texture mapping units 8 16
Render output processors 8 8
Pixel rate 4 GPixel/s 4 GPixel/s
Texture rate 4 GTexel/s 8 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 52.8 GFLOPS 80 GFLOPS


GeForce GT 320M  vs
9600M GT Mac 
Memory clock speed 790 MHz 792 MHz
Effective memory clock speed 1,580 MHz 1,584 MHz
Memory bus 128 bit 128 bit
Memory 1,024 MB 512 MB
Memory type DDR3 GDDR3
Memory bandwidth 25.28 GB/s 25.34 GB/s

noise and power

TDP 23W 23W


comments powered by Disqus