GeForce GT 425M vs 9650M GT |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Better PassMark score | 625 | vs | 259 | Around 2.5x better PassMark score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Slightly more render output processors | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GT 425M vs 9650M GT
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
Features Key features of the GeForce GT 425M vs 9650M GT
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 9600M GT vs 9650M GT | ||
 | VS | |
| 4650 vs 9650M GT | ||
 | VS | |
| 220M vs 9650M GT | ||
 | VS |  |
| 540M vs 425M | ||
 | VS | |
| 460M vs 425M | ||
 | VS | |
| 740M vs 425M | ||
 | VS | |
| 630M vs 425M | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $304 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
 | VS |  |
| 960 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 380 vs 960 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 390 vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $274 | ||
| 960 vs 750 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs R9 290X | ||
