Winner
Nvidia GeForce GT 520M
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GT 520M based on its compute performance.
See full details GeForce GT 520M vs 610M |
Released January, 2011
Nvidia GeForce GT 520M
- 672 MHz
- 1 GB DDR3
4.2 Out of 10
by Syed-Muhammad-Usman-Pirzada (Oct, 2013)Wow, #AsRock and #BMW DesignWorks USA’s #M8 Gaming Machine is a beauty.
VS
Released December, 2011
Nvidia GeForce 610M
- 672 MHz
- 1 GB DDR3
3.4 Out of 10
by Tim-Verry (Jun, 2013)These chips are still based on Kepler (600-series), but feature more CUDA cores, more memory, a wider memory bus, and faster clockspeeds.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 520M vs 610M among Laptop GPUs under 35W TDP
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan and Cloud Gate Factor | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 4.2 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Nvidia GeForce GT 520MGPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Slightly better fire strike factor score | 11.72 | vs | 4.91 | Around 2.5x better fire strike factor score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slightly more render output processors | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| |||||||
| Better T-Rex score | 2,064.48 | vs | 1,621.67 | More than 25% better T-Rex score | |||
Report a correction
