Winner
Nvidia GeForce 820M
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce 820M based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GT 520M vs 820M |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 520M vs 820M among Laptop GPUs under 35W TDP
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan and Cloud Gate Factor | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 2.4 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Nvidia GeForce 820MGPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Slightly higher clock speed | 672 MHz | vs | 625 MHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Much higher dirt3 framerate | 13.7 | vs | 12.6 | Around 10% higher dirt3 framerate | |||
| Much better manhattan score | 3,533.46 | vs | 1,466.95 | Around 2.5x better manhattan score | |||
| Better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 7,518 | vs | 4,742.5 | Around 60% better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
| Slightly better PassMark score | 600 | vs | 382 | More than 55% better PassMark score | |||
| Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 4,254 | vs | 1,825 | More than 2.2x better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Slightly better 3DMark06 score | 1,266.5 | vs | 502 | More than 2.5x better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Better particle simulation score | 74.26 mInteraction/s | vs | 25.04 mInteraction/s | Around 3x better particle simulation score | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 550 | vs | 214 | More than 2.5x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 900 MHz | vs | 800 MHz | Around 15% higher memory clock speed | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GT 520M vs 820M
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Dirt3
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 740M vs 820M | ||
 | VS | |
| 840M vs 820M | ||
 | VS | |
| R5 M230 vs 820M | ||
 | VS | |
| 720M vs 820M | ||
 | VS | |
| 920M vs 820M | ||
 | VS | |
| R7 M265 vs 820M | ||
 | VS | |
| 8670M vs 820M | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $304 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
 | VS |  |
| 960 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 380 vs 960 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 390 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs R9 290X | ||
