Winner
Nvidia GeForce 920M
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce 920M based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GT 520M vs 920M |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 520M vs 920M among Laptop GPUs under 35W TDP
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan and Cloud Gate Factor | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 5.8 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Nvidia GeForce 920MGPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Lower TDP | 12W | vs | 33W | 2.7x lower TDP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Much better T-Rex score | 3,358.92 | vs | 1,621.67 | More than 2x better T-Rex score | |||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 954 MHz | vs | 672 MHz | More than 40% higher clock speed | |||
| Better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 9,003.5 | vs | 4,742.5 | Around 90% better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
| Better PassMark score | 711 | vs | 382 | More than 85% better PassMark score | |||
| Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 5,032.5 | vs | 1,825 | More than 2.8x better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Better 3DMark06 score | 1,731 | vs | 502 | Around 3.5x better 3DMark06 score | |||
| More memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 732.7 GFLOPS | vs | 129.02 GFLOPS | Around 5.8x better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher texture rate | 30.53 GTexel/s | vs | 5.38 GTexel/s | Around 5.8x higher texture rate | |||
| More render output processors | 16 | vs | 4 | 12 more render output processors | |||
| More texture mapping units | 32 | vs | 8 | 24 more texture mapping units | |||
| Slightly higher pixel rate | 7.63 GPixel/s | vs | 1.34 GPixel/s | Around 5.8x higher pixel rate | |||
| More shading units | 384 | vs | 48 | 336 more shading units | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 648 | vs | 214 | More than 3x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Better sky diver factor score | 102.8 | vs | 42.96 | Around 2.5x better sky diver factor score | |||
| Slightly better face detection score | 8.36 mPixels/s | vs | 3.24 mPixels/s | More than 2.5x better face detection score | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 900 MHz | vs | 800 MHz | Around 15% higher memory clock speed | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GT 520M vs 920M
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 920M vs R5 M330 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 920M vs 840M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 920M vs 820M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 920M vs 920MX | ||
| | VS |  |
| $200 | ||
| 920M vs 660 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 920M vs R5 M430 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 920M vs R5 M335 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $280 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 580 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| 750 Ti vs 960 | ||
