Winner
Nvidia GeForce 920M
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce 920M based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details | GeForce GT 520M vs 920M |
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan and Cloud Gate Factor |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more |
Value | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
5.8 | Overall Score |
| |
Winner |
| ![]() | Nvidia GeForce 920MGPUBoss Winner |
| |||||||
Lower TDP | 12W | vs | 33W | 2.7x lower TDP | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Much better T-Rex score | 3,358.92 | vs | 1,621.67 | More than 2x better T-Rex score | |||
Significantly higher clock speed | 954 MHz | vs | 672 MHz | More than 40% higher clock speed | |||
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 9,003.5 | vs | 4,742.5 | Around 90% better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
Better PassMark score | 711 | vs | 382 | More than 85% better PassMark score | |||
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 5,032.5 | vs | 1,825 | More than 2.8x better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
Better 3DMark06 score | 1,731 | vs | 502 | Around 3.5x better 3DMark06 score | |||
More memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory | |||
Better floating-point performance | 732.7 GFLOPS | vs | 129.02 GFLOPS | Around 5.8x better floating-point performance | |||
Higher texture rate | 30.53 GTexel/s | vs | 5.38 GTexel/s | Around 5.8x higher texture rate | |||
More render output processors | 16 | vs | 4 | 12 more render output processors | |||
More texture mapping units | 32 | vs | 8 | 24 more texture mapping units | |||
Slightly higher pixel rate | 7.63 GPixel/s | vs | 1.34 GPixel/s | Around 5.8x higher pixel rate | |||
More shading units | 384 | vs | 48 | 336 more shading units | |||
Better PassMark direct compute score | 648 | vs | 214 | More than 3x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
Better sky diver factor score | 102.8 | vs | 42.96 | Around 2.5x better sky diver factor score | |||
Slightly better face detection score | 8.36 mPixels/s | vs | 3.24 mPixels/s | More than 2.5x better face detection score | |||
Higher memory clock speed | 900 MHz | vs | 800 MHz | Around 15% higher memory clock speed |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
920M vs R5 M330 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
920M vs 840M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
920M vs 820M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
920M vs 920MX | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | ||
920M vs 660 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
920M vs R5 M430 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
920M vs R5 M335 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
970 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
1060 vs RX 580 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
750 Ti vs 960 | ||