GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 520MX vs 920M among Laptop GPUs under 35W TDP

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan and Cloud Gate Factor

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

5.3

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce 920M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce 920M  based on its benchmarks.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GT 520MX

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 520MX

Report a correction
Slightly lower TDP 20W vs 33W Around 40% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce 920M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 920M

Report a correction
Much better T-Rex score 3,358.92 vs 1,617.3 More than 2x better T-Rex score
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 9,003.5 vs 5,296 More than 70% better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Better PassMark score 711 vs 400 Around 80% better PassMark score
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 5,032.5 vs 2,200.5 More than 2.2x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Better 3DMark06 score 1,731 vs 596.5 Around 3x better 3DMark06 score
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Slightly higher clock speed 954 MHz vs 900 MHz More than 5% higher clock speed
Better floating-point performance 732.7 GFLOPS vs 172.8 GFLOPS Around 4.2x better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 30.53 GTexel/s vs 7.2 GTexel/s Around 4.2x higher texture rate
More render output processors 16 vs 4 12 more render output processors
More texture mapping units 32 vs 8 24 more texture mapping units
More shading units 384 vs 48 336 more shading units
Slightly better sky diver factor score 102.8 vs 50.45 More than 2x better sky diver factor score
Slightly better face detection score 8.36 mPixels/s vs 3.31 mPixels/s More than 2.5x better face detection score

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GT 520MX vs 920M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GT 520MX
15.4 mHash/s
GeForce 920M
40.41 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GT 520MX
3.31 mPixels/s
GeForce 920M
8.36 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GT 520MX
122.37 frames/s
GeForce 920M
157.17 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GT 520MX
31.4 mInteraction/s
GeForce 920M
161.39 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce 920M
3,358.92

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GT 520MX
1,932.25
GeForce 920M
3,685.69

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus