GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 610 vs 610M among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

5.9

Overall Score

Winner
ASUS GeForce GT 610 

GPUBoss recommends the ASUS GeForce GT 610  based on its benchmarks.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GT 610

Reasons to consider the
ASUS GeForce GT 610

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 810 MHz vs 672 MHz More than 20% higher clock speed
Better 3DMark06 score 3,910 vs 507.5 Around 7.8x better 3DMark06 score
Slightly more memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Front view of GeForce 610M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 610M

Report a correction
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 4,598 vs 560 Around 8.2x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Higher memory clock speed 800 MHz vs 600 MHz Around 35% higher memory clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GT 610 vs 610M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GT 610
4.05 mHash/s
GeForce 610M
9.69 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GT 610
2.47 mPixels/s
GeForce 610M
2.75 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GT 610
79.36 frames/s
GeForce 610M
110.21 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GT 610
1,270.59
GeForce 610M
2,064.48

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce 610M
1,308.32

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Comments

comments powered by Disqus