GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 620 vs 230M among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GT 620

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 620

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 810 MHz vs 500 MHz More than 60% higher clock speed
Slightly higher memory clock speed 898 MHz vs 800 MHz More than 10% higher memory clock speed
Front view of GeForce GT 230M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 230M

Report a correction
Slightly more memory 1,024 MB vs 512 MB 2x more memory
Slightly higher memory bandwidth 25.6 GB/s vs 14.37 GB/s Around 80% higher memory bandwidth
Slightly more render output processors 8 vs 4 Twice as many render output processors
Slightly more texture mapping units 16 vs 8 Twice as many texture mapping units
Slightly better T-Rex score 2,088.76 vs 1,173.34 Around 80% better T-Rex score
Slightly wider memory bus 128 bit vs 64 bit 2x wider memory bus

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GT 620 vs 230M

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GT 620
1,173.34
GeForce GT 230M
2,088.76

Comments

comments powered by Disqus