Winner
ASUS GeForce GT 610
GPUBoss recommends the ASUS GeForce GT 610 based on its noise and power.
See full details GeForce GT 630 vs 610 |
Released June, 2012
EVGA GeForce GT 630
- 810 MHz
- 1 GB GDDR5
6.3 Out of 10
by Doug-Crowthers (Apr, 2012)It is based on the Fermi GF116, which features 144 CUDA cores, 1.5 GB or 3 GB GDDR3 192-bit memory interface, 720 MHz core clock speed, and 891 MHz memory clock speed.
VS
Released May, 2012
ASUS GeForce GT 610
- 810 MHz
- 2 GB DDR3
5.9 Out of 10
by Ryan-Smith (May, 2012)With 96 CUDA cores we’re not 100% sure that this is GF108 as opposed to the 28nm GK117, but as NVIDIA currently has a 28nm capacity bottleneck we can’t see them placing valuable 28nm chips in low-end retail cards.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 630 vs 610 among Desktop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.3 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly higher effective memory clock speed | 3,200 MHz | vs | 1,200 MHz | Around 2.8x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | vs | 9.6 GB/s | More than 5.2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Better sky diver factor score | 100.02 | vs | 33.52 | Around 3x better sky diver factor score | |||
| Higher battlefield 3 framerate | 38 | vs | 27 | More than 40% higher battlefield 3 framerate | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 800 MHz | vs | 600 MHz | Around 35% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Better ocean surface simulation score | 203.54 frames/s | vs | 79.55 frames/s | More than 2.5x better ocean surface simulation score | |||
| |||||||
| More memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Lower TDP | 29W | vs | 65W | 2.2x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GT 630 vs 610
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
FarCry 3
Battlefield 3
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $107 | $83 | |
| 630 vs 730 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $107 | ||
| 630 vs 710 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $107 | ||
| 630 vs 650 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $107 | ||
| 630 vs R7 240 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $107 | ||
| 630 vs 550 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $55 | ||
| 610 vs 710 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $55 | ||
| 610 vs 5450 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 1050 vs MX150 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $349 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $349 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| $349 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 580 | ||
