Winner
Nvidia GeForce 920M
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce 920M based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GT 630M vs 920M |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 630M vs 920M among Laptop GPUs under 35W TDP
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan and Cloud Gate Factor | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 5.3 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Nvidia GeForce 920MGPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 3,600 MHz | vs | 1,800 MHz | 2x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wider memory bus | 128 bit | vs | 64 bit | 2x wider memory bus | |||
| |||||||
| Much better T-Rex score | 3,358.92 | vs | 2,994.54 | More than 10% better T-Rex score | |||
| Higher clock speed | 954 MHz | vs | 800 MHz | Around 20% higher clock speed | |||
| Slightly better 3DMark06 score | 1,731 | vs | 1,051 | Around 65% better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Significantly higher diablo III framerate | 36.65 fps | vs | 23 fps | Around 60% higher diablo III framerate | |||
| More render output processors | 16 | vs | 4 | 12 more render output processors | |||
| Higher texture rate | 30.53 GTexel/s | vs | 12.8 GTexel/s | Around 2.5x higher texture rate | |||
| More shading units | 384 | vs | 96 | 288 more shading units | |||
| More texture mapping units | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many texture mapping units | |||
| Higher battlefield 4 framerate | 9.6 | vs | 6.3 | More than 50% higher battlefield 4 framerate | |||
| Slightly better cloud gate factor score | 9.7 | vs | 7.71 | More than 25% better cloud gate factor score | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 648 | vs | 373 | Around 75% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GT 630M vs 920M
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Battlefield 4
Bioshock Infinite
Laptops
Looking for a laptop?
- 3 laptops with the GeForce GT 630M, starting from $880
- 40 laptops with the GeForce 920M, starting from $570
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $267 | ||
| GeForce GTX 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $267 | ||
| GeForce GTX 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $267 | ||
| GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon RX 580 | ||
| | VS | |
| GeForce GTX 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| GeForce GTX 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| GeForce GTX 970 vs 960 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $274 | ||
| GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs 950 | ||
