GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 630M vs 540M among Laptop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GT 630M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 630M

Report a correction
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 8,610 vs 888 Around 9.8x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Much higher dirt3 framerate 19.9 vs 13 Around 55% higher dirt3 framerate
Higher clock speed 800 MHz vs 672 MHz Around 20% higher clock speed
Higher effective memory clock speed 3,600 MHz vs 1,800 MHz 2x higher effective memory clock speed
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Front view of GeForce GT 540M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 540M

Report a correction
Much better T-Rex score 3,068.37 vs 2,994.54 Almost the same
Much better 3DMark06 score 7,986 vs 1,051 More than 7.5x better 3DMark06 score

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GT 630M vs 540M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GT 630M
20.98 mHash/s
GeForce GT 540M
16.75 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GT 630M
5.06 mPixels/s
GeForce GT 540M
4.43 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GT 630M
2,994.54
GeForce GT 540M
3,068.37

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GT 630M
2,068.17
GeForce GT 540M
2,594.12

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Comments

comments powered by Disqus