Winner
Nvidia GeForce GT 640M
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GT 640M based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GT 640M vs 630M |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 640M vs 630M among Laptop GPUs under 35W TDP
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan and Cloud Gate Factor | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 3.4 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Nvidia GeForce GT 640MGPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Better PassMark score | 932 | vs | 678 | More than 35% better PassMark score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much higher hitman: absolution framerate | 7.45 | vs | 5.1 | More than 45% higher hitman: absolution framerate | |||
| Significantly better manhattan score | 3,590.88 | vs | 2,068.17 | Around 75% better manhattan score | |||
| Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 6,348 | vs | 3,985 | Around 60% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Slightly better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 10,625.5 | vs | 8,610 | Around 25% better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
| Slightly better 3DMark06 score | 1,728 | vs | 1,051 | Around 65% better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Significantly higher diablo III framerate | 42.7 fps | vs | 23 fps | More than 85% higher diablo III framerate | |||
| More render output processors | 16 | vs | 4 | 12 more render output processors | |||
| More shading units | 384 | vs | 96 | 288 more shading units | |||
| More texture mapping units | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many texture mapping units | |||
| Higher crysis 3 framerate | 6.5 fps | vs | 4.45 fps | More than 45% higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
| Better particle simulation score | 97.1 mInteraction/s | vs | 57.64 mInteraction/s | Around 70% better particle simulation score | |||
| Slightly higher BioShock infinite framerate | 14.3 fps | vs | 9.08 fps | More than 55% higher BioShock infinite framerate | |||
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 800 MHz | vs | 625 MHz | Around 30% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 3,600 MHz | vs | 1,800 MHz | 2x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GT 640M vs 630M
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Battlefield 4
Bioshock Infinite
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 740M vs 630M | ||
 | VS | |
| 540M vs 630M | ||
 | VS | |
| 720M vs 630M | ||
 | VS | |
| 820M vs 630M | ||
 | VS | |
| 7670M vs 630M | ||
 | VS | |
| 840M vs 630M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 740M vs 640M | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $267 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
 | VS | |
| $267 | ||
| RX 580 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $267 | ||
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
 | VS | |
| 960 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 390 vs 970 | ||
