Winner
Nvidia GeForce GT 1030
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GT 1030 based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GT 710 vs 1030 |
Expected June, 2013
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
- 954 MHz
- 2 GB DDR3
5.9 Out of 10
by Sebastian-Peak (Apr, 2016)Granted, you won't be doing much gaming on a GTX 710, which features 192 CUDA cores and 1GB of DDR3 memory, but this card does provide support for up to 3 monitors via DVI, HDMI, and VGA outputs.
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 710 vs 1030 among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.4 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Nvidia GeForce GT 1030GPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Slightly lower TDP | 19W | vs | 30W | More than 35% lower TDP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Much higher effective memory clock speed | 6,008 MHz | vs | 1,800 MHz | More than 3.2x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Higher clock speed | 1,227 MHz | vs | 954 MHz | Around 30% higher clock speed | |||
| Better PassMark score | 2,256 | vs | 658 | Around 3.5x better PassMark score | |||
| Much better manhattan score | 3,705.74 | vs | 2,030.89 | More than 80% better manhattan score | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | vs | 14.4 GB/s | More than 3.2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Better fire strike factor score | 27.03 | vs | 5.67 | More than 4.8x better fire strike factor score | |||
| Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,502 MHz | vs | 900 MHz | More than 65% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Slightly better floating-point performance | 1,127 GFLOPS | vs | 366.3 GFLOPS | More than 3x better floating-point performance | |||
| Slightly higher pixel rate | 11.74 GPixel/s | vs | 3.82 GPixel/s | More than 3x higher pixel rate | |||
| Better ocean surface simulation score | 417.91 frames/s | vs | 100.39 frames/s | Around 4.2x better ocean surface simulation score | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 1,617 | vs | 523 | More than 3x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
Report a correction
