Winner
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GT 730 based on its benchmarks.
See full details GeForce GT 730 vs 210 |
Expected June, 2013
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
- 902 MHz
- 1 GB GDDR5
6.3 Out of 10
by Anthony-Garreffa (Jan, 2013)NVIDIA are now listing something called the "GeForce Performance Score" which is used to define the performance of a part relative to Intel's HD4000 iGPU.
VS
Released September, 2009
Nvidia GeForce 210
- 475 MHz
- 1 GB DDR2
6 Out of 10
by Usman-Pirzada (Jul, 2013)This 3W is equal to Intel’s SDP calculation which for the Haswell Fanless SoC is 4.5W. The GX-210JA will support an impressive 1Ghz Clock Speed.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 730 vs 210 among Desktop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.3 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much higher effective memory clock speed | 5,012 MHz | vs | 800 MHz | More than 6.2x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly higher clock speed | 902 MHz | vs | 475 MHz | Around 90% higher clock speed | |||
| Much better T-Rex score | 3,356.26 | vs | 1,060.28 | Around 3.2x better T-Rex score | |||
| Better PassMark score | 922 | vs | 177 | Around 5.2x better PassMark score | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | vs | 6.4 GB/s | More than 6.2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Much higher memory clock speed | 1,253 MHz | vs | 400 MHz | Around 3.2x higher memory clock speed | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 692.7 GFLOPS | vs | 35.2 GFLOPS | Around 19.8x better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher metro: last light framerate | 72 | vs | 43 | More than 65% higher metro: last light framerate | |||
| More shading units | 384 | vs | 16 | 368 more shading units | |||
| |||||||
| Slightly lower TDP | 31W | vs | 38W | Around 20% lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GT 730 vs 210
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Bioshock Infinite
Metro: Last Light
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $98 | ||
| Radeon R7 240 vs GeForce GT 730 | ||
 | VS | |
| $98 | ||
| GeForce GT 1030 vs 730 | ||
 | VS | |
| $98 | ||
| GeForce GTX 650 vs GT 730 | ||
 | VS | |
| $98 | ||
| GeForce GT 710 vs 730 | ||
 | VS | |
| $98 | ||
| GeForce GTX 550 Ti vs GT 730 | ||
 | VS | |
| $98 | ||
| Radeon R7 250 vs GeForce GT 730 | ||
 | VS | |
| $200 | $98 | |
| GeForce GTX 660 vs GT 730 | ||
