Winner
Nvidia GeForce GT 1030
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GT 1030 based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GT 730 vs 1030 |
Expected June, 2013
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
- 902 MHz
- 1 GB GDDR5
6.2 Out of 10
by Anthony-Garreffa (Jan, 2013)NVIDIA are now listing something called the "GeForce Performance Score" which is used to define the performance of a part relative to Intel's HD4000 iGPU.
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 730 vs 1030 among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.4 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Nvidia GeForce GT 1030GPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 730 Retail vs the 1030. | |||||||
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 1,227 MHz | vs | 902 MHz | More than 35% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better PassMark score | 2,256 | vs | 922 | Around 2.5x better PassMark score | |||
| Much better manhattan score | 3,705.74 | vs | 1,699.46 | Around 2.2x better manhattan score | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 6,008 MHz | vs | 5,012 MHz | Around 20% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Slightly more memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Better fire strike factor score | 27.03 | vs | 11.11 | Around 2.5x better fire strike factor score | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,502 MHz | vs | 1,253 MHz | Around 20% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 1,617 | vs | 640 | More than 2.5x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Better ocean surface simulation score | 417.91 frames/s | vs | 198.18 frames/s | More than 2x better ocean surface simulation score | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GT 730 vs 1030
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 1030 vs 750 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1030 vs RX 550 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1030 vs 1050 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $98 | ||
| 730 vs R7 240 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $98 | ||
| 730 vs 650 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $98 | ||
| 730 vs 710 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $98 | $200 | |
| 730 vs 660 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $282 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 580 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 vs MX150 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $282 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $282 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 1070 vs RX 580 | ||
 | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 3 comments.
