GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 740 vs R7 250

Gaming

Real world tests using the latest 3D games

crysis: warhead (2013), Crysis: Warhead (2012), Batman: Arkham City and 6 more

Benchmarks

Synthetic tests to measure overall performance

Passmark

Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU

Passmark Direct Compute

Noise and Power

How loud and hot does the card run idle and under load

TDP

GPUBoss Score

Gaming, Benchmarks, Compute Performance and Noise and Power

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GT 740 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GT 740  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GT 740

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 740

Report a correction
Slightly higher effective memory clock speed 5,000 MHz vs 4,600 MHz Around 10% higher effective memory clock speed
More render output processors 16 vs 8 Twice as many render output processors
Higher memory clock speed 1,250 MHz vs 1,150 MHz Around 10% higher memory clock speed
Front view of Radeon R7 250

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R7 250

Report a correction

GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Radeon R7 250 vs the Nvidia GeForce GT 740.

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GT 740 vs Radeon R7 250

Passmark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performance

We don't use 3DMark to draw GPU performance conclusions but it does make for a great optimization target.
Radeon R7 250 | by Anand-Lal-Shimpi (Jun, 2013)

Passmark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

Comments

Showing 2 comments.
i don't why nVidia always wins
I don t know whats better but I think they are in the rang
comments powered by Disqus