GeForce GT 740 vs 1030 |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 740 vs 1030 among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Nvidia GeForce GT 1030GPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 80.2 GB/s | vs | 48.06 GB/s | More than 65% higher memory bandwidth | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More render output processors | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 1,227 MHz | vs | 993 MHz | Around 25% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 6,008 MHz | vs | 5,012 MHz | Around 20% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Slightly more memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Better fire strike factor score | 27.03 | vs | 15.34 | More than 75% better fire strike factor score | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,502 MHz | vs | 1,253 MHz | Around 20% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 1,617 | vs | 786 | More than 2x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Lower TDP | 30W | vs | 64W | 2.1x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
