Winner
Nvidia GeForce GT 740M
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GT 740M based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GT 740M vs 820M |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 740M vs 820M among Laptop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 5.9 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Nvidia GeForce GT 740MGPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark06 score | 10,161 | vs | 1,266.5 | More than 8x better 3DMark06 score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher clock speed | 810 MHz | vs | 625 MHz | Around 30% higher clock speed | |||
| Much higher dead space 3 framerate | 33.95 fps | vs | 21.7 fps | More than 55% higher dead space 3 framerate | |||
| More memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Much higher hitman: absolution framerate | 6.35 | vs | 4.9 | Around 30% higher hitman: absolution framerate | |||
| Significantly higher diablo III framerate | 46.2 fps | vs | 33.9 fps | More than 35% higher diablo III framerate | |||
| Slightly higher texture rate | 25.92 GTexel/s | vs | 10 GTexel/s | More than 2.5x higher texture rate | |||
| Better particle simulation score | 158.65 mInteraction/s | vs | 74.26 mInteraction/s | Around 2.2x better particle simulation score | |||
| More render output processors | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| Wider memory bus | 128 bit | vs | 64 bit | 2x wider memory bus | |||
| More shading units | 384 | vs | 96 | 288 more shading units | |||
| More texture mapping units | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many texture mapping units | |||
| |||||||
| Better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 7,518 | vs | 1,873 | More than 4x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
| Better manhattan score | 3,533.46 | vs | 2,901.63 | More than 20% better manhattan score | |||
| Lower TDP | 15W | vs | 45W | 3x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GT 740M vs 820M
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Bioshock Infinite
Hitman: Absolution
Laptops
Looking for a laptop?
- 7 laptops with the GeForce GT 740M, starting from $660
- 8 laptops with the GeForce 820M, starting from $410
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 840M vs 740M | ||
 | VS | |
| 8750M vs 740M | ||
 | VS | |
| 8670M vs 740M | ||
 | VS | |
| 750M vs 740M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 840M vs 820M | ||
 | VS | |
| R5 M230 vs 820M | ||
 | VS | |
| 720M vs 820M | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $267 | ||
| RX 580 vs 1060 | ||
 | VS | |
| $267 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $267 | ||
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
 | VS | |
| 960 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 390 vs 970 | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 8 comments.
