Winner
Nvidia GeForce GT 740M
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GT 740M based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details | GeForce GT 740M vs 820M |
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Value | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
6 | Overall Score |
| |
Winner |
Nvidia GeForce GT 740MGPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
| |||||||
Much better 3DMark06 score | 10,161 | vs | 1,266.5 | More than 8x better 3DMark06 score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher clock speed | 810 MHz | vs | 625 MHz | Around 30% higher clock speed | |||
Much higher dead space 3 framerate | 33.95 fps | vs | 21.7 fps | More than 55% higher dead space 3 framerate | |||
More memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory | |||
Much higher hitman: absolution framerate | 6.35 | vs | 4.9 | Around 30% higher hitman: absolution framerate | |||
Significantly higher diablo III framerate | 46.2 fps | vs | 33.9 fps | More than 35% higher diablo III framerate | |||
Slightly higher texture rate | 25.92 GTexel/s | vs | 10 GTexel/s | More than 2.5x higher texture rate | |||
Better particle simulation score | 158.65 mInteraction/s | vs | 74.26 mInteraction/s | Around 2.2x better particle simulation score | |||
More render output processors | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
Wider memory bus | 128 bit | vs | 64 bit | 2x wider memory bus | |||
More shading units | 384 | vs | 96 | 288 more shading units | |||
More texture mapping units | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many texture mapping units | |||
| |||||||
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 7,518 | vs | 1,873 | More than 4x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
Better manhattan score | 3,533.46 | vs | 2,901.63 | More than 20% better manhattan score | |||
Lower TDP | 15W | vs | 45W | 3x lower TDP |
Looking for a laptop?
![]() | VS | ![]() |
840M vs 740M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
8750M vs 740M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
8670M vs 740M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
750M vs 740M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
840M vs 820M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R5 M230 vs 820M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
920M vs 820M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1060 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
960 vs 750 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R9 390 vs 970 | ||