GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 750M vs 840M among Laptop GPUs


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more


T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more


Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more


Overall Score

Nvidia GeForce GT 750M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GT 750M  based on its gaming and benchmarks.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GT 750M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 750M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 13,670 vs 2,338 More than 5.8x better 3DMark06 score
Better PassMark score 1,288 vs 879 More than 45% better PassMark score
Higher effective memory clock speed 4,000 MHz vs 2,002 MHz Around 2x higher effective memory clock speed
Much higher diablo III framerate 66.6 fps vs 17.7 fps More than 3.8x higher diablo III framerate
Higher memory bandwidth 64 GB/s vs 16.02 GB/s Around 4x higher memory bandwidth
Much better manhattan score 3,570.08 vs 1,855.62 More than 90% better manhattan score
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Much higher crysis 3 framerate 16 vs 6.3 More than 2.5x higher crysis 3 framerate
Higher crysis 3 framerate 9.85 fps vs 6.3 fps More than 55% higher crysis 3 framerate
More render output processors 16 vs 8 Twice as many render output processors
Wider memory bus 128 bit vs 64 bit 2x wider memory bus
More texture mapping units 32 vs 16 Twice as many texture mapping units
Front view of GeForce 840M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 840M

Report a correction
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 10,332 vs 2,543 More than 4x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Higher clock speed 1,029 MHz vs 941 MHz Around 10% higher clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 1,124 MHz vs 967 MHz More than 15% higher turbo clock speed
Slightly better particle simulation score 184.99 mInteraction/s vs 146.77 mInteraction/s More than 25% better particle simulation score
Slightly lower TDP 33W vs 50W Around 35% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GT 750M vs 840M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GT 750M
27.59 mHash/s
GeForce 840M
94.68 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GT 750M
16.18 mPixels/s
GeForce 840M
22.54 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GT 750M
GeForce 840M

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GT 750M
GeForce 840M

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark


Battlefield 4

Read more


Showing 5 comments.
lol true, obviously an incorrect score.
840m's 3dmark11's score is 10,165.5 lol. GTX 680 can barely touch the 10k barrier.
Correct. And GT 750M score is 2512
3DMark 11 Graphic score of Geforce 840m in is not (10.204) its 2333.!!??
(3DMark 11 Graphics) score in is not (10.204) its 2333.!!??
comments powered by Disqus