GeForce GT 750M vs 840M |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 750M vs 840M among Laptop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Nvidia GeForce GT 750MGPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark06 score | 13,670 | vs | 2,338 | More than 5.8x better 3DMark06 score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better PassMark score | 1,288 | vs | 879 | More than 45% better PassMark score | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 4,000 MHz | vs | 2,002 MHz | Around 2x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Much higher diablo III framerate | 66.6 fps | vs | 17.7 fps | More than 3.8x higher diablo III framerate | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | vs | 16.02 GB/s | Around 4x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| More memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Much higher crysis 3 framerate | 16 | vs | 6.3 | More than 2.5x higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
| Higher crysis 3 framerate | 9.85 fps | vs | 6.3 fps | More than 55% higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
| More render output processors | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| Wider memory bus | 128 bit | vs | 64 bit | 2x wider memory bus | |||
| More texture mapping units | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many texture mapping units | |||
| |||||||
| Better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 10,332 | vs | 2,543 | More than 4x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
| Higher clock speed | 1,029 MHz | vs | 941 MHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 1,124 MHz | vs | 967 MHz | More than 15% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Slightly better particle simulation score | 184.99 mInteraction/s | vs | 146.77 mInteraction/s | More than 25% better particle simulation score | |||
| Slightly lower TDP | 33W | vs | 50W | Around 35% lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GT 750M vs 840M
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Thief
Battlefield 4
Laptops
Looking for a laptop?
- 12 laptops with the GeForce GT 750M, starting from $800
- 20 laptops with the GeForce 840M, starting from $579
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 840M vs 740M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 840M vs 850M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 840M vs 920M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 840M vs R7 M265 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 840M vs 820M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 840M vs 940M | ||
 | VS | |
| 750M vs 850M | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 580 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $280 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs R9 390 | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 5 comments.
