Winner
Nvidia GeForce GT 750M
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GT 750M based on its .
See full details GeForce GT 750M vs 9600M GT |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 750M vs 9600M GT among Laptop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better T-Rex score | 3,360.34 | vs | 2,024.88 | More than 65% better T-Rex score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much higher clock speed | 941 MHz | vs | 500 MHz | Around 90% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 4,000 MHz | vs | 1,600 MHz | 2.5x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| More memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 512 MB | 4x more memory | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | vs | 25.6 GB/s | Around 2.5x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 722.7 GFLOPS | vs | 80 GFLOPS | More than 9x better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher texture rate | 30.11 GTexel/s | vs | 8 GTexel/s | More than 3.8x higher texture rate | |||
| More shading units | 384 | vs | 32 | 352 more shading units | |||
| More render output processors | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| More texture mapping units | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many texture mapping units | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,000 MHz | vs | 800 MHz | 25% higher memory clock speed | |||
| |||||||
| Lower TDP | 23W | vs | 50W | 2.2x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
