GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 755M vs 840M among Laptop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

5.8

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GT 755M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GT 755M  based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GT 755M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 755M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 15,861 vs 2,338 More than 6.8x better 3DMark06 score
Better PassMark score 1,577 vs 879 Around 80% better PassMark score
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 5,400 MHz vs 2,002 MHz Around 2.8x higher effective memory clock speed
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 11,600 vs 6,627 More than 75% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Higher memory bandwidth 86.4 GB/s vs 16.02 GB/s Around 5.5x higher memory bandwidth
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Significantly better manhattan score 3,327.28 vs 1,855.62 Around 80% better manhattan score
Significantly higher crysis 3 framerate 12.4 fps vs 6.3 fps More than 95% higher crysis 3 framerate
Higher pixel rate 15.7 GPixel/s vs 8.23 GPixel/s More than 90% higher pixel rate
Higher memory clock speed 1,350 MHz vs 1,001 MHz Around 35% higher memory clock speed
Better ocean surface simulation score 455.8 frames/s vs 159.36 frames/s More than 2.8x better ocean surface simulation score
Slightly higher texture rate 31.36 GTexel/s vs 16.46 GTexel/s More than 90% higher texture rate
Higher battlefield 4 framerate 17.9 vs 11.2 Around 60% higher battlefield 4 framerate
More render output processors 16 vs 8 Twice as many render output processors
Wider memory bus 128 bit vs 64 bit 2x wider memory bus
More texture mapping units 32 vs 16 Twice as many texture mapping units
Higher BioShock infinite framerate 24.2 fps vs 13.5 fps Around 80% higher BioShock infinite framerate
Better cloud gate factor score 12.88 vs 10.08 Around 30% better cloud gate factor score
Front view of GeForce 840M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 840M

Report a correction
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 10,332 vs 2,800.5 Around 3.8x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Slightly lower TDP 33W vs 50W Around 35% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GT 755M vs 840M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GT 755M
28.03 mHash/s
GeForce 840M
94.68 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GT 755M
12.45 mPixels/s
GeForce 840M
22.54 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GT 755M
3,342.63
GeForce 840M
3,359.62

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GT 755M
3,327.28
GeForce 840M
1,855.62

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Battlefield 4

Bioshock Infinite

Comments

Showing 1 comment.
Pretty sure the 3D Mark 11 scores are off....
comments powered by Disqus