Winner
Nvidia GeForce 940M
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce 940M based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GT 820M vs 940M |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 820M vs 940M among Laptop GPUs under 35W TDP
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan and Cloud Gate Factor | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 7.8 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Nvidia GeForce 940MGPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Lower TDP | 15W | vs | 33W | 2.2x lower TDP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 1,072 MHz | vs | 775 MHz | Around 40% higher clock speed | |||
| Better PassMark score | 952 | vs | 640 | Around 50% better PassMark score | |||
| More memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Significantly better particle simulation score | 262.54 mInteraction/s | vs | 54.69 mInteraction/s | More than 4.8x better particle simulation score | |||
| Slightly better floating-point performance | 823.3 GFLOPS | vs | 297.6 GFLOPS | More than 2.8x better floating-point performance | |||
| More shading units | 384 | vs | 96 | 288 more shading units | |||
Report a correction
